Opportunities/JRFA-2026-007
JRFA-2026-007Active

Alternative Position, Navigation, and Timing (Alt-PNT) for GPS-Denied Environments

Joint Rapid Fielding Activity (JRFA)

Posted

Mar 9, 2026

Deadline

Sep 30, 2026

205

Days

:

09

Hours

Alt-PNTGPS-Denied OperationsInertial NavigationQuantum SensingTiming HoldoverSignals of OpportunityElectronic Warfare ResilienceAssured PNTMEMS IMUChip-Scale Atomic ClocksCelestial NavigationMulti-Domain Operations

Description

The Joint Rapid Fielding Activity (JRFA) seeks innovative Alternative Position, Navigation, and Timing (Alt-PNT) solutions capable of sustaining military operations when GPS is degraded, denied, or spoofed. This Open Challenge accepts submissions on a rolling basis with quarterly review cycles. Offerors may propose solutions addressing one or more PNT modalities across any form factor — from chip-scale implementations for guided munitions to rack-mount systems for surface combatants and submarines.

Overall Objective

Identify, evaluate, and accelerate fielding of alternative PNT technologies that provide operationally relevant position accuracy and timing precision when GPS is unavailable, degraded, or contested. The objective encompasses solutions across the full spectrum of military platforms — dismounted soldiers, ground vehicles, unmanned aerial systems (UAS), guided munitions, rotary- and fixed-wing aircraft, surface combatants, and submarines — with the goal of establishing a layered, resilient PNT architecture that no single adversary capability can defeat.

Problem Statement

GPS dependence represents the single greatest cross-cutting vulnerability in the Department of War's operational architecture. Virtually every weapons system, platform, command-and-control network, and logistics function relies on GPS-derived position and timing signals. The constellation's signal strength at Earth's surface (approximately -130 dBm) makes it inherently vulnerable to both jamming and spoofing. Peer adversaries — principally China and Russia — have demonstrated sophisticated electronic warfare capabilities that can deny GPS over areas exceeding 300 kilometers in radius, as observed in ongoing conflicts and large-scale exercises. Russia's deployment of systems like the R-330Zh Zhitel and China's investment in GPS countermeasures present an immediate and growing threat to GPS-dependent operations.

Desired Solution

Offerors shall propose Alt-PNT solutions in one or more of the following technology areas: (1) advanced inertial navigation systems (INS) including MEMS, fiber-optic gyroscope (FOG), ring laser gyroscope (RLG), and cold-atom/quantum inertial measurement units (IMU); (2) signals of opportunity (SoOp) exploitation including LEO satellite constellations (Starlink, Iridium, Orbcomm), cellular (4G/5G), digital television (ATSC 3.0), FM/AM broadcast, and other ambient RF sources; (3) non-RF navigation including magnetic anomaly navigation (MAGNAV), gravity gradiometry, terrain-referenced navigation (TERCOM/DSMAC), visual-inertial odometry (VIO), and celestial navigation (star trackers, daytime celestial sensors); (4) precision timing sources including chip-scale atomic clocks (CSAC), miniature rubidium standards, optical atomic clocks, and timing distribution architectures; and (5) multi-source PNT fusion engines that integrate two or more of the above modalities into a cohesive navigation solution with integrity monitoring and spoofing detection.

Key Attributes

Position & Navigation Accuracy

Dismounted Horizontal CEP (60 min GPS-denied)Threshold: ≤25 meters; Objective: ≤10 meters
Vehicle/UAS Horizontal CEP (120 min GPS-denied)Threshold: ≤20 meters; Objective: ≤5 meters
Munition Terminal CEP (300 sec flight)Threshold: ≤10 meters; Objective: ≤3 meters
Platform CEP (24 hr GPS-denied)Threshold: ≤100 meters; Objective: ≤50 meters

Timing & Synchronization

UTC Holdover (1 hour, no GPS)Threshold: ≤1 microsecond; Objective: ≤100 nanoseconds
Extended Holdover (24 hours, platform-class)Threshold: ≤100 microseconds; Objective: ≤10 microseconds
Munition Timing (600 sec mission)Threshold: ≤10 microseconds; Objective: ≤1 microsecond
1PPS Output AccuracyThreshold: ≤500 nanoseconds to UTC; Objective: ≤50 nanoseconds to UTC

SWaP-C by Form Factor

Chip-Scale (munition-class)Requirement: ≤10 cm³, ≤50 g, ≤1 W, ≤$500/unit at 10K qty
Soldier-PortableRequirement: ≤200 cm³, ≤500 g, ≤5 W including antenna/sensor
Vehicle/UAS ModuleRequirement: ≤2,000 cm³, ≤5 kg, ≤25 W
Platform Rack-MountRequirement: ≤1/2 ATR, ≤15 kg, ≤100 W

Environmental & Robustness

Operating Temperature (ground)Requirement: -40°C to +71°C per MIL-STD-810H Method 501.7/502.7
Operating Temperature (munition)Requirement: -54°C to +85°C per MIL-STD-810H
Shock (munition-class)Requirement: Survive ≥20,000 g setback per MIL-STD-810H Method 516.8
VibrationRequirement: Per MIL-STD-810H Method 514.8, Category 4 (wheeled vehicle) minimum

Submission Scoring Rubric

Technical Merit & Innovation

35%
Criterion 1
Demonstrated PNT accuracy (position and timing) relative to threshold/objective requirements, supported by test data or validated simulation
Criterion 2
Technical novelty and differentiation from existing fielded or programmed solutions (e.g., does this close a gap not addressed by MGUE, DAGR, or EGI?)
Criterion 3
Robustness of approach to diverse GPS-denial scenarios including wideband jamming, meaconing/spoofing, and indoor/underground/urban canyon environments

Technology Maturity & Fieldability

25%
Criterion 1
Current Technology Readiness Level (TRL) with credible evidence — hardware demonstrations, test reports, peer-reviewed publications
Criterion 2
Realistic and resourced plan to advance from current TRL to TRL 7 within 24 months, including identification of key technical risks and mitigations
Criterion 3
Manufacturing readiness — path to production quantities at stated SWaP-C targets, including supply chain considerations for critical components

SWaP-C & Scalability

20%
Criterion 1
Compliance with SWaP-C targets for proposed form factor(s) — chip-scale, soldier, vehicle, or platform class
Criterion 2
Credible unit cost projections at production quantities (1K, 10K, 100K units) with identified cost reduction pathway
Criterion 3
Scalability across multiple form factors or platform classes from a common technology base

Integration & Operational Utility

20%
Criterion 1
Compatibility with existing DoW PNT architectures, interfaces, and standards (MIL-STD-1553B, ARINC 429, STANAG 4586, MGUE)
Criterion 2
Minimal integration burden on host platform — low SWAP overhead, standard interfaces, no requirement for platform-specific modifications
Criterion 3
Operational concept that addresses realistic military scenarios including rapid deployment, field calibration, and operation by MOS-qualified (non-specialist) personnel

Submit a Proposal

JRFA members can submit proposals for this opportunity. Not a member yet?

Submit ProposalBecome a Member →

Have Questions?

Submit questions through the JRFA platform. Answers are posted publicly for all members.

Contact Us →